You can only start two quarterbacks each week so a third in that scenario is one less live bullet, but if you have two starting then you can only start three running backs or three receivers, too. Similarly, I think a third quarterback pick is probably the ideal way to play it not just for the increased insurance and weekly upside, but because with 20 rounds it's easier to find the RB/WR/TE utility that you'd normally pursue by forgoing the additional quarterback pick. Since Underdog implemented a 20-round format, though, I think in 1QB leagues it made more sense to go 3QB than it did in prior years. There's a case too for going with just two quarterbacks – theoretically the exchange of fragility at quarterback becoming a benefit toward RB/WR/TE – and I think that would apply more reliably in an 18-round setup. If you have killers at your top two quarterback spots, by contrast, you might want to stop at three. The more zero-QB a roster, the more reasonable the expense of a QB4, in other words. If your top two or three quarterbacks don't cumulatively carry the possibility of ranking in at least the top half of league quarterback scoring then maybe that would be a scenario where taking a fourth quarterback makes the most sense. You'll obviously need a decent point total at quarterback to place well in a superflex league, so whatever approach you take at quarterback has to theorize around that reality. 4QB builds are probably reasonable in some situations, but 3QB might be the ideal setup
Pretty much any build theory is justified up to a certain point. Perhaps someone like Lawrence, Watson or Prescott might be a slightly bitter pill to take after seeing quarterbacks who go multiple rounds higher in 1QB go just one or two picks before yours, but will it get much better if your recourse is running one of those Rodgers → Carr guys or worse as your QB1? Maybe, I'm agnostic though. If further justification is needed then I'd say they're reasonable picks because if they aren't then the next chance you'll have to take a quarterback will be picks 32 through 35, where the ADP lines up nearest to Aaron Rodgers (27.7 ADP), Jared Goff (29.3 ADP), Geno Smith (32.7 ADP), Russell Wilson (36.3 ADP) and Derek Carr (41.0 ADP). I think that alone makes them justifiable selections from the eighth pick onward, just not as obviously correct as the teams slotted in the top seven would be to take quarterbacks. Lawrence, Deshaun Watson (12.2 ADP) and Dak Prescott (13.9 ADP) don't quite qualify for either category, but they've come close enough previously to make them viable candidates to do so in the future. Or in the cases of Jackson and Justin Fields (4.5 ADP), quarterbacks who have 40-point upside on the basis of running ability. I'm a big fan of Lawrence and like his chances of making the leap to the 5,000-yard/30-TD upside offered by Herbert et al, but there's arguably reason to give a greater benefit of the doubt to quarterbacks who have already done it. I'm somewhat arbitrarily making Lamar Jackson (9.3 ADP) the cutoff for that after QB6 Justin Herbert (6.5 ADP), though right now Trevor Lawrence (8.2) is higher in the ADP than Jackson. The intense quarterback scarcity is real in superflex, and as the ADP implies there's an almost indisputable need to pick a quarterback if you have one of the first seven slots or so. The top 10 quarterbacks are justifiable first-round picks, and the first seven quarterbacks are almost mandatory top-seven picks
The top 10 quarterbacks are justifiable first-round picks, and the first seven quarterbacks are almost mandatory top-seven After doing a handful of drafts, though, I think there are certain general points that should be safe to say. I don't really do much of it at all, and it's taking me some time to calibrate to the new, different markets relative to 1QB drafting. To be transparent, Superflex is new to me.
#Superflex strategy code
Sign up for Underdog to receive a free 6-month subscription to RotoWire and first deposit match up to $100 with promo code RWNFL. Just like the 1QB Big Board contest, the draft runs 20 rounds. It makes for a lively, dynamic terrain from draft to draft and introduces some curveballs drafters might not be used to. The superflex spot opens one floodgate of change relative to the past Underdog NFL ADP, and the WR change springs another puncture somewhere else. The other is that rather than 3WR, the format starts 2WR in addition to 1QB/2RB/1TE/1Flex/1Superflex. The Superflex detail is just one notable change in this format. The $10 contest is filling up quickly, so if you want to draft some superflex best ball teams you'll need to be reasonably punctual about it. While the initial loadout of the Big Board 1QB tournament is full, Underdog Fantasy kept the momentum going in their NFL best ball section by launching the Superflex variation of the tournament, simply titled the Big Board: Superflex.
0 kommentar(er)
